States as Interest Groups in the Administrative Process

Article — Volume 100, Issue 5

100 Va. L. Rev. 953
Download PDF

A rising tide in federalism scholarship and political discourse accords unmitigated praise to the notion of partnership between states and federal agencies. This Article reveals a more complicated picture. It begins by analyzing the penetrating but usually invisible role of “state interest groups”—lobbying associations of state officials—in shaping federal regulation. These groups have become the core vehicle for state involvement in federal administration, but surprisingly, their pervasive and critical role is rarely noted in the legal literature.

The Article shows that the pathologies of state interest groups reflect broader, latent tensions within the emerging project of administrative federalism. To develop this claim, the Article disaggregates a trio of benefits thought to flow from state involvement in federal administration—protecting state power, enhancing agency expertise, and maintaining a democratically accountable process—and shows that these benefits are unlikely to coincide. Instead, mechanisms designed to pursue state power as an end in itself thrive at the expense of expertise and accountability. The project of affording states a voice in the federal regulatory process must therefore begin to take account of tradeoffs among key goals, not just benefits. The Article closes by sketching best practices to help agencies, courts, and states balance the competing goals of administrative federalism.

Click on a link below to access the full text of this article. These are third-party content providers and may require a separate subscription for access.

  Volume 100 / Issue 5  

Marrying Liberty and Equality: The New Jurisprudence of Gay Rights

By Cary Franklin
100 Va. L. Rev. 817

Beyond Title VII: Rethinking Race, Ex-Offender Status, and Employment Discrimination in the Information Age

By Kimani Paul-Emile
100 Va. L. Rev. 893

States as Interest Groups in the Administrative Process

By Miriam Seifter
100 Va. L. Rev. 953

Surprisingly Punitive Damages

By Bert I. Huang
100 Va. L. Rev. 1027