Reforming (and Saving) the IRS by Respecting the Public’s Right to Know

Article — Volume 100, Issue 6

100 Va. L. Rev. 1115
Download PDF

The current controversy involving possible political targeting by the IRS in administering the exempt organization (“EO”) tax laws is simply the latest in a long succession of similar allegations spanning at least five decades. This Article proposes to address the problem through increased transparency of the IRS’s administrative actions involving EOs. Greater transparency responds directly to the public’s frustration in not being able to monitor the agency and gain confidence that the laws are being applied in an even-handed manner.

Proposals to increase the transparency of government commonly confront some claimed governmental interest in secrecy, such as a national security or law enforcement concern. Transparency of the government’s tax decisions, however, encounters the further problem that it violates the privacy rights of taxpayers. This latter clash arises because the government’s tax administration decisions generally turn on the information it has extracted under compulsion from taxpayers. Thus, meaningful transparency of one (the government’s tax decisions) almost necessarily requires meaningful transparency of the other (taxpayer tax return information). Fortunately, Congress has long recognized good policy reasons to make public a substantial amount of EO tax return information. Thus, slight liberalizations of the existing disclosure rules for such information may allow sufficient government transparency to satisfy the public’s right to know in the precise area of the law that has generated the most controversy. Opening up more EO tax return information and IRS EO decision making to public scrutiny would tend to deter IRS misbehavior, reduce suspicions of such misconduct, and promote fuller communication both to establish any impropriety and avert false charges against the agency.

Click on a link below to access the full text of this article. These are third-party content providers and may require a separate subscription for access.

  Volume 100 / Issue 6  

A Tribute to Peter Low

By Paul G. Mahoney
100 Va. L. Rev. 1111

Reforming (and Saving) the IRS by Respecting the Public’s Right to Know

By George K. Yin
100 Va. L. Rev. 1115

Offsetting Benefits

By Ariel Porat and Eric Posner
100 Va. L. Rev. 1165

Transactionalism Costs

By Alan M. Trammell
100 Va. L. Rev. 1211