A Litigation Association Model to Aggregate Mass Tort Claims for Adjudication

Note — Volume 91, Issue 6

91 Va. L. Rev. 1463
Download PDF

The judicial system does not adequately accommodate mass tort claims. Even the Rule 23 class action, which is otherwise a powerful aggregation tool, often fails to facilitate trying these claims. This Note argues that a combination of associational standing and statistical sampling produces a new and more effective means to aggregate mass tort claims for adjudication. Claimants can organize an unincorporated association; the association can file a suit seeking redress for its members’ injuries; and evidence can be presented in aggregated form. The proposal is a significant departure from the traditional method of representative litigation—the class action. Yet its predicates are, separately, well established. Moreover, this Note argues that aggregation through association may be preferable to aggregation through class action for several reasons: for example, it may reduce the cost of litigation and perhaps more significantly, it overcomes the choice of law problems that often prevent certification of a mass tort class action under Rule 23.

The relationship between associational standing and sampling is significant and has thus far gone unrecognized: Sampling allows aggregated evidence to take the place of individualized evidence and thereby overcomes the most significant limitation on the use of associational standing in damages actions. The proposal does not require satisfaction of the various prerequisites to class certification contained in Rule 23. The Note examines the history of representative group litigation and concludes, however, that those prerequisites are unnecessary where representation is based on consent (as it is in this Note’s proposal) as opposed to a common interest (what underlies Rule 23).

Click on a link below to access the full text of this article. These are third-party content providers and may require a separate subscription for access.

  Volume 91 / Issue 6  

Monopoly, Mercantilism, and Intellectual Property

By Thomas B. Nachbar
91 Va. L. Rev. 1313

Shopping for Gucci on Canal Street: Reflections on Status Consumption, Intellectual Property and the Incentive Thesis

By Jonathan M. Barnett
91 Va. L. Rev. 1381

Liberalism and the Unpleasant Question of Torture

By David J. Luban
91 Va. L. Rev. 1425

A Litigation Association Model to Aggregate Mass Tort Claims for Adjudication

By Christopher J. Roche
91 Va. L. Rev. 1463