Functionality Screens

Article — Volume 103, Issue 7

103 Va. L. Rev. 1293
Download PDF

Among intellectual property (“IP”) doctrines, only utility patents should protect function. Utility patents offer strong rights that place constraints on competition, but they only arise when inventors can demonstrate substantial novelty after a costly examination. Copyrights, trademarks, and design patents are much easier to obtain than utility patents, and they often last much longer. Accordingly, to prevent claimants from obtaining “backdoor patents,” the other IP doctrines must screen out functionality. As yet, however, courts and scholars have paid little systematic attention to the ways in which these functionality screens operate across and within IP law.

We have four tasks in this Article. First, we identify three separate functionality screens that IP laws use: Filtering, Exclusion, and Threshold. Second, we illustrate the use of these different screens in copyright, trademark, and design patent laws. Each law takes a different approach to screening functionality. Third, we model the relative costs and benefits of the different screening regimes, paying particular attention to administrative and error costs and how these costs affect incentives and competition. Finally, we assess the current screening regimes and offer suggestions for how they might be improved.

Click on a link below to access the full text of this article. These are third-party content providers and may require a separate subscription for access.

  Volume 103 / Issue 7  

Functionality Screens

By Christopher Buccafusco & Mark A. Lemley
103 Va. L. Rev. 1293

Justice, Interrupted: The Effect of Gender, Ideology, and Seniority at Supreme Court Oral Arguments

By Tonja Jacobi and Dylan Schweers
103 Va. L. Rev. 1379

Legislative Underwrites

By Ethan J. Leib & James J. Brudney
103 Va. L. Rev. 1487

A Cost-Benefit Analysis–Based Interpretation of Reciprocity Under Clean Air Act Section 115(c)

By Jim Dennison
103 Va. L. Rev. 1561