Entrapment, Punishment, and the Sadistic State

Note — Volume 93, Issue 4

93 Va. L. Rev. 1081
Download PDF

The entrapment defense is a uniquely American institution, adopted in all American jurisdictions, and almost nowhere else. But while case law and scholarly literature dwell at length on entrapment’s what (what constitutes entrapment; the legal test to be applied), and sometimes on its who (who should rule on entrapment, judge or jury; who qualifies as a state actor), they have comparatively neglected its why—the underlying justification for a defense that, on further examination, seems to violate some of the most basic principles of criminal law jurisprudence. Why should someone who commits a crime, with a criminal state of mind, be found not guilty because the one who tempted him to commit the crime, an otherwise irrelevant fact, was—entirely unbeknownst to him—a police agent? 

This Note first shows the insufficiency of existing justifications of the entrapment defense, then provides a more comprehensive explanation for the doctrine. This explanation reveals entrapment to be not a procedural “technicality” protecting a value extrinsic to the underlying prohibition, but rather a substantive defense whose roots run right to the criminal law’s heart: our reasons for punishment. A “punishment-centered” view reveals entrapment to be a manifestation of a totalitarian “sadistic state,” which treats the infliction of punishment not as a means of giving the guilty their just deserts, but as an end in itself, and shows the entrapment defense to be not only a limit on police investigatory technique, but an assertion of individual liberty against the state’s ability to punish.

Click on a link below to access the full text of this article. These are third-party content providers and may require a separate subscription for access.

  Volume 93 / Issue 4  

Structural Reform Prosecution

By Brandon L. Garrett
93 Va. L. Rev. 853

Cooperative Localism: Federal-Local Collaboration in an Era of State Sovereignty

By Nestor M. Davidson
93 Va. L. Rev. 959

Delegation Really Running Riot

By Larry Alexander and Saikrishna Prakash
93 Va. L. Rev. 1035

Entrapment, Punishment, and the Sadistic State

By Andrew Carlon
93 Va. L. Rev. 1081