Common Sense about Common Decency: Promoting a New Standard for Guard-on-Inmate Sexual Abuse under the Eighth Amendment

When inmates claim they are sexually abused by their prison guards, many courts scrutinize their claims to determine, as a threshold inquiry, whether they allege objectively serious injury. Courts often hold that guard-on-inmate sexual abuse does not inflict that level of injury, and therefore does not violate the Eighth Amendment or impose cruel and unusual punishment.

The dominant body of law arrives at the wrong conclusion because it focuses on the wrong question.  It asks whether guard-on-inmate sexual abuse imposes a threshold level of physical or psychological harm on an inmate. Instead, Eighth Amendment case law should simply ask whether a guard’s sexual abuse of an inmate, as specifically defined in current federal law, can be justified by any legitimate prison-management purpose. If it cannot, the law should presume that guard-on-inmate conduct violates contemporary standards of decency, and thus violates the Eighth Amendment.

This Note will demonstrate that courts’ misdirected focus has negative ramifications beyond its maladjustment to our society’s contemporary standards of decency. First, courts are less likely to find that male inmates meet the injury threshold. Consequently, the dominant standard often results in male inmates receiving less recognition and relief than female or transgender inmates for psychological injuries suffered from sexual abuse. Second, this disparate treatment and certain language in the case law promote a discourse about gender that proves problematic for men, women, and transgender persons alike.

Through this Note, I offer two fairly simple solutions to eliminate this disparate treatment and adjust Eighth Amendment standards to more closely correspond with current sexual abuse law and societal norms. Using emerging case law and Supreme Court precedent, I enumerate specific standards that advocates and courts can use to properly redirect the focus of the Eighth Amendment inquiry from the injury threshold to whether contemporary standards of decency have been violated by guard-on-inmate sexual abuse. State and federal law show our current societal norms deeply condemn such abuse, and suggest courts should presume violations of contemporary standards of decency in specified circumstances of sexual abuse.

An Empirical Analysis of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act

This Note undertakes an empirical analysis of the effects of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act on corruption and U.S. investment abroad.  It also examines macroeconomic variables to analyze the law’s distributional effects across countries.  To date, no quantitative research has been conducted on the effect of the FCPA in combatting corruption.  Using multiple linear regression models, this Note uses a dataset comprised of up to 118 countries and focuses on the 2000 to 2011 time period.  The results of this research find a negative correlation between the growth rate of perceptions of corruption and the incidence of prosecuted FCPA violations in a given country.  This finding may provide some support for, and is at least consistent with, the idea that the FCPA has been effective in reducing corruption.  The data, however, do not show a significant relationship between the growth of U.S. investment and the frequency of FCPA violations.  Therefore, the empirical results of this Note do not appear to provide support for the idea that the FCPA has been an impediment to U.S. investment abroad.  Finally, the results also find that firms operating in overseas markets with certain characteristics are more exposed to FCPA enforcement actions than others.  Even after controlling for initial levels of corruption and U.S. investment, violations are more likely to occur in fuel-exporting economies, manufacturing economies, and economies with relatively small governments.  This insight is useful for firms in creating risk-based compliance programs.