In Tribute: Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson III

On the occasion of Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson’s fortieth year on the bench, these Essays honor his contributions to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, to American law, and to the lives of his clerks and colleagues.


FOREWORD
Jay Wilkinson as Teacher ……………………….. John C. Jeffries, Jr.       248


ESSAYS

Judge Wilkinson’s First Amendment:                     Dan Richardson
     Safeguarding the Democratic Process ………….Leslie Kendrick      250

The Judge ………………………………………….. Judge Daniel A. Bress      261

Prudence, Role Morality, and
    Restraint: Judge Wilkinson                    Katherine Mims Crocker
    on the Separation of Powers ………………………. Jack Goldsmith       269

Learning to Disagree Agreeably ……………….. Allison Orr Larsen        283

Larry Walker: An Intellectual Pioneer

It is hard to picture Larry Walker in retirement. He looks not a day older than when I arrived in Charlottesville twenty-one years ago and remains an energetic and enthusiastic teacher, scholar, and participant in the intellectual life of the Law School. I think of Larry in much the way I do our colleague Glen Robinson-regardless of his chronological age, he is always intellectually in his prime.

Larry is a native of South Carolina who gradually worked his way north to Virginia. He graduated from Davidson College in 1959 and from Duke Law School in 1963. After law school, he served in the Army, practiced law in Atlanta, and served as counsel to the Senate Judiciary Committee. He then received an S.J.D. degree from Harvard to prepare for an academic career, which he began at the University of North Carolina Law School.

Larry taught Civil Procedure among other things, and like many teachers of that subject, routinely explained the logic behind procedural rules with reference to widely shared assumptions about human behavior and psychology. But he found himself wondering why lawyers took those assumptions to be true.

That led him to seek out John Thibaut, a social psychologist at UNC whose research focused on perceptions of fairness. They set out together to study the fairness of legal procedures-not from the standpoint of moral theory or intuition but as perceived by the parties to a legal dispute. In doing so, Larry can fairly be called one of the pioneers in the use of experimental methods in law.

Theirs was interdisciplinary research at its finest, making important contributions both to law and psychology. At that time, research on perceptions of fairness in psychology focused almost entirely on the distribution of resources. Thibaut and Walker opened a rich vein of research by turning attention to subjects’ perception of the fairness of the procedure by which a distribution was determined. Their research was part of a revolution in social psychology that affected not only thinking about law, but about business and public policy, among other things.

The work was no less revolutionary in the legal academy. In the 1970s, law and social science meant law and economics, and law and economics meant the application of microtheory to the analysis of legal rules. Thibaut and Walker’s work, by contrast, drew on psychology and used empirical methods to test theory instead of using theory to explain doctrine.

One of their early experiments involved the resolution of a simulated dispute between experimental subjects.[1] They compared two dispute-resolution procedures, one adversarial in the style of Anglo-American litigation and one inquisitorial in the style of continental European adjudication. They found that subjects perceived the adversarial system, which gives the parties themselves more control over the evidence and arguments presented, as more fair than the inquisitorial system. Later work found that experimental subjects were more likely to conclude that the substantive outcome of litigation was fair if they had first concluded that the procedure was fair.[2]

Larry visited here and, fortunately for Virginia, accepted an offer to join our faculty in 1978. Shortly after his arrival, the Law School became the first American law school to hire a non-lawyer psychologist as a full-time member of the faculty. John Monahan’s hire was a testament to the Law School’s strong emphasis on interdisciplinary study. It also gave Larry the opportunity to continue collaborating with an outstanding psychologist. Thus began a long and productive partnership that has produced some of the most influential and thoughtful scholarship on law and social science methods ever written, a collaboration that Larry has identified as the highlight of his professional career.

John and Larry’s first project was a casebook, Social Science in Law, the first of its kind, published in 1985 and still widely in use today in its 6th edition.[3] The casebook project forced them to think broadly and systematically about the use of social science research in legal disputes. John and Larry concluded that social science was used in litigation for three basic purposes. The first two were not novel: social science methods could be used to establish case specific facts. Empirical results and theory from the social sciences could be used as a source of authority that could inform doctrine. The third, however, was novel; they noted that social science research is often used as a “framework,” as they put it, to guide the court in determining facts. For example, research into the accuracy of visual memory can help a fact-finder decide how much weight to assign to an eyewitness’s testimony about a perpetrator’s height or clothing. This taxonomy of the use of social science research shaped John and Larry’s research agenda for several years and produced a series of articles that to this day inform the use of social science in litigation.[4] They then turned to a number of discrete problems of social science methodology within law.[5]

To his faculty colleagues, Larry’s infectious good humor and openness have been as important as his intellectual contributions. Larry’s boisterous, exuberant laugh communicates uninhibited pleasure and has rung frequently through these halls for the past thirty-three years. He is a wonderful friend as well as a wonderful colleague. He and his wife Sharon have been a delightful presence at the Law School and we all hope to have the benefit of their friendship for many years to come.

 


[1] See John Thibaut & Laurens Walker, Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis (1975) (summarizing several articles that reported the findings of a series of Thibaut and Walker’s laboratory experiments comparing “adversarial” and “inquisitorial” procedures).

[2] See Laurens Walker, E. Allan Lind & John Thibaut, The Relation Between Procedural and Distributive Justice, 65 Va. L. Rev. 1401 (1979).

[3] John Monahan & Laurens Walker, Social Science in Law: Cases and Materials (6th ed. 2006).

[4] See, e.g., United States v. Hessling, 845 F.2d 617, 621 n.1 (6th Cir. 1988); Tuli v. Brigham & Women’s Hosp., 592 F. Supp. 2d 208,210 n.2 (D. Mass. 2009).

[5] See John Monahan & Laurens Walker, A Judges’ Guide to Using Social Science, 43 Ct. Rev. 156 (2007); John Monahan, Laurens Walker & Gregory Mitchell, The Limits of Social Framework Evidence, 8 Law, Probability & Risk 307 (2009); Laurens Walker & John Monahan, Sampling Evidence at the Crossroads, 80 S. Cal. L. Rev. 969 (2007); Laurens Walker & John Monahan, Scientific Authority: The Breast Implant Litigation and Beyond, 86 Va. L. Rev. 801 (2000).

A Tribute to Gordon Hylton

When Gordon Hylton joined the University of Virginia School of Law faculty three years ago, it was a true homecoming. Gordon’s affiliation with the Law School began more than four decades ago and shifted over time from student to alumnus to visitor to professor. In every role, Gordon’s intelligence, humor, warmth, and generosity left an indelible mark on this community and beyond.

A native of southwest Virginia, Gordon headed to college at Oberlin in 1970. With a degree in History and English Literature in hand, he was then among the first cohort to pioneer the JD/MA in legal history program here at UVA. After law school, Gordon clerked for Justice Albertis S. Harrison and Chief Justice Lawrence I’Anson of the Virginia Supreme Court, and then worked for the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination. Returning to the academy, Gordon earned his Ph.D. in the History of American Civilization from Harvard in 1986. He began his law teaching career at Illinois Institute of Technology’s Chicago-Kent School of Law, where he served on the faculty for eight years. He then enjoyed a 20-year tenure at Marquette University, beginning in 1995. Gordon found his way back to the Law School as a visiting professor in 2009 and joined the faculty full time in 2015.

Beyond his family and friends, Gordon had three great loves: sports, teaching, and history. Gordon’s interest in sports was both academic and extracurricular, serious and playful. He served as chair of the Association of American Law School’s Section on Law and Sports and a member of the Executive Committee of the National Sports Law Institute Board of Advisors. He authored a casebook on Sports Law and Regulation[1], as well as articles on topics like “How the Morals Clause in Jack Molinas’ Contract Saved the National Basketball Association in 1954”[2] and “A Foul Ball in the Courtroom: The Baseball Spectator Injury as a Case of First Impression.”[3]

On the extracurricular front, one of “Give’em Hell” Hylton’s most cherished places in Charlottesville was the softball field across from the Law School. His love of sports produced a key component of his Law School legacy: co-founding the North Grounds Softball League (NGSL) in 1976.[4] The league, and the camaraderie always at its heart, has been a centerpiece of the Law School ever since. It is one of our oldest student organizations, and it not only produces much joy among our students, but it annually contributes five-figure donations to charity.[5] While Gordon was thrilled to return to the Law School full-time in 2015 to teach alongside his former professors—like Ted White, Dick Howard, and Chuck McCurdy—he also reveled in the opportunity it afforded him to play softball again. In 2017, on the 40th anniversary of the league, Gordon led his team in the Founding Fathers game where NGSL originals squared off against current students. Indeed, Gordon holds the distinct privilege of being the only person to play in the NGSL as a student, alumnus, and professor.[6] It is an honor that I know he would hold dear.

Gordon’s love of teaching infected his courses and inspired his students, who recall him as passionate, keen-minded, and gentle-hearted. Whether in first-year property, advanced courses on trusts and estates and professional responsibility, or intimate seminars on the history of African American lawyers, Gordon offered his vast stores of knowledge to students with characteristic modesty, intellectual generosity, and a sincere interest in their ideas and ambitions. His cold calls were warm and his office hours lasted as long as it took. Gordon especially loved teaching first semester, first-year students at the beginning of their legal journey. But he was equally committed to guiding students through sophisticated research projects and sharing in their contemplation of the most fundamental legal questions. His view that “the legal profession will be better off if lawyers are as concerned about what the law should be as they are in knowing what the law is,”[7] and his willingness to help students answer both questions, inspired generations of lawyers who are as aspirational as they are expert.

Gordon’s profound influence on his students was both intensely personal and institutionally visible. Gordon managed to win recognition and awards for his teaching and mentoring at every stage of his career. As an assistant senior tutor for Dunster House while a graduate student at Harvard, he received the House System’s highest award for his mentoring efforts. Washington University School of Law named him Professor of the Year when he served as a visiting professor – a singular distinction never since duplicated. While at Chicago-Kent, he twice received the University Award for Excellence in Teaching and thrice the Student Bar Association Professor of the Year Award. Such honors followed him to Marquette, where he received the Ghiardi Award for Excellence in Teaching, among other honors.

Gordon’s intellectual generosity extended far beyond his students. He was an avid reader of both student and faculty scholarship. When he returned a paper, he often accompanied it with a detailed memo full of corrections, quick wit, and new bits of edifying history. Gordon knew a lot, and his scholarly interests ranged widely. In addition to sports law, he authored books and articles on property, the legal profession, trusts and estates, and the Supreme Court. Gordon had a special affinity for trivia and deployed his talent as a phone-a-friend lifeline on four separate occasions on the game show Who Wants to be a Millionaire? Surely that is a record—one that speaks both to his easy mental access to a vast storehouse of information and his generosity in deploying it on behalf of his friends.

Gordon’s love of history was special, and as Ted White has noted, it “will have a long shelf life.”[8] From constitutional and Supreme Court history to the history of civil rights, African American lawyers, and the legal profession, Gordon approached a good historical puzzle the way a detective approaches a crime scene: with unending curiosity, deep humanity, and meticulous attention to detail. In recent years, Gordon focused his formidable historical research and analysis on the history of the Law School itself. He found here a model of nineteenth-century legal education that rivaled Harvard’s Langdellian approach and had long been lost in the latter’s shadow. He also brought to light and to life crucial people and transformative aspects of the Law School’s more recent history that had also remained too long obscured.

We are particularly indebted to Gordon for his excavation of the landmark entry to the Law School of Gregory Swanson, the first African American admitted to both the Law School and the University. Swanson’s time here had been shrouded in myth until Gordon’s exhaustive research and unstinting honesty recovered it. As his friend and colleague Kim Forde-Mazrui said, Gordon was committed to “getting the facts and history right, no matter [their] complexity or controversial nature.”[9] Thanks to Gordon, we understand more about our history, and consequently our present and our future, than ever before.

As I wrote this tribute, I kept in mind an observation that Special Collections Librarian Randi Flaherty offered after collaborating with Gordon on Swanson’s history. “Working with Gordon,” she said, “cemented for me that there are no throwaway sentences when you are writing history. Every piece of information or interpretation you present is a claim about someone’s life, a real person’s life, and there is responsibility there to get it right.”[10]

I sincerely hope that I have gotten it right. Gordon left this world too soon, with passions still to pursue and work still to be done. Even so, Gordon leaves us with so many gifts—of friendship, wisdom, and knowledge. We are honored to steward and build upon his unique legacy.

 


[1] Sports Law and Regulation (Paul M. Anderson & Joseph Gordon Hylton eds. 1999).

[2] J. Gordon Hylton, “How the Morals Clause in Jack Molinas’ Contract Saved the National Basketball Association in 1954,” Fordham Sports Law Forum (2013).

[3] J. Gordon Hylton, “A Foul Ball in the Courtroom: The Baseball Spectator Injury as a Case of First Impression,” 38 Tulsa L. Rev. 485 (2003).

[4] 6 Questions with Professor J. Gordon Hylton (Jul. 22, 2016), https://www.law. virginia.edu/news/201607/6-questions-professor-j-gordon-hylton [permalink: https://perma.cc/GA5Q-3TGQ].

[5] Eric Williamson, Glory Days: 40 Years of NGSL (Apr. 3, 2017), https://www.law.virgi nia.edu/news/201704/glory-days-40-years-ngsl [permalink: https://perma.cc/6KBK-KS7P].

[6] North Grounds Softball League, The Founding of NGSL, http://ngsl.com/index.php/the-founding-of-the-north-grounds-softball-league/ [permalink: https://perma.cc/M8BN-3FQB].

[7] Lia-Michelle Keane, In Memoriam: An Interview with Professor J. Gordon Hylton (May 2, 2018), https://www.lawweekly.org/features/2018/5/2/in-memoriam-an-interview-with-professor-j-gordon-hylton [permalink: https://perma.cc/9SSF-2AB4].

[8] Eric Williamson, In Memoriam: Gordon Hylton, Legal Historian and Softball League Co-Founder, https://news.virginia.edu/content/memoriam-gordon-hylton-legal-historian-and-softball-league-co-founder [permalink: https://perma.cc/3TFE-BPCD].

[9] Id.

[10] Randi Flaherty, Remebering Gordon Hylton, MoreUS, https://library.law.virginia .edu/ajm-blog/author/rlflaherty/ [permalink: https://perma.cc/8VAB-C8UR].